Skip to content

Breast

Key points

Breast Anatomy and Lymphatic Drainage

  1. Principal Blood Supply:
    • The breast receives its principal blood supply from:
      • Perforating branches of the internal mammary artery.
      • Lateral branches of the posterior intercostal arteries.
      • Branches from the axillary artery, including the highest thoracic, lateral thoracic, and pectoral branches of the thoracoacromial artery.
  2. Lymphatic Drainage:
    • The axillary lymph nodes usually receive >75% of the lymph drainage from the breast.
    • The rest flows through lymph vessels that accompany the perforating branches of the internal mammary artery and enter the parasternal (internal mammary) group of lymph nodes.

Breast Development and Benign Disorders

  1. Breast Development:
    • Initiated by a variety of hormonal stimuli, with major trophic effects being modulated by estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin.
  2. Benign Breast Disorders:
    • Related to the normal processes of reproductive life and involution.
    • There is a spectrum of breast conditions that ranges from normal to disorder to disease (aberrations of normal development and involution classification).

Breast Cancer Risk and Screening

  1. Breast Cancer Risk Calculation (Gail Model):
    • To calculate breast cancer risk using the Gail model [ value of >1.7 is significant], a woman’s risk factors are translated into an overall risk score by multiplying her relative risks from several categories.
    • This risk score is then compared with an adjusted population risk of breast cancer to determine the woman’s individual risk.
    • This model is not appropriate for use in women with a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation or women with lobular or ductal carcinoma in situ*.
  2. Screening Recommendations:
    • Routine use of screening mammography in women ≥50 years of age reduces mortality from breast cancer by 25%.
    • MRI screening is recommended in women with BRCA mutations and may be considered in women with a greater than 20% to 25% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

  1. Diagnosis:
    • Core-needle biopsy is the preferred method for the diagnosis of palpable or nonpalpable breast abnormalities.
  2. Surgical Considerations:
    • When a diagnosis of breast cancer is made, the surgeon should determine the clinical stage, histologic characteristics, and appropriate biomarker levels before initiating local therapy.
  3. Sentinel Node Dissection:
    • Preferred method for staging the regional lymph nodes in women with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer.
    • Axillary dissection may be avoided in women with one to two positive sentinel nodes who are treated with breast-conserving surgery, whole breast radiation, and systemic therapy.
  4. Therapy Decisions:
    • Local-regional and systemic therapy decisions for an individual patient with breast cancer are best made using a multidisciplinary treatment approach.
    • The sequencing of therapies is dependent on patient and tumor-related factors, including breast cancer subtype.

Grave Signs of Breast Cancer (Described by Haagensen and Stout, 1943)

  • Edema of the skin of the breast
  • Skin ulceration
  • Chest wall fixation
  • Axillary lymph node > 2.5 cm in diameter
  • Fixed axillary lymph nodes

Modified Radical Mastectomy (Patey and Dyson, 1948)

  • Advocated by: Patey and Dyson, Middlesex Hospital, London.
  • Purpose: Management of advanced operable breast cancer.
  • Technique:
    • Removal of breast and axillary lymph nodes.
    • Preservation of the pectoralis major muscle.
    • Removal of the pectoralis minor muscle to allow access to and clearance of axillary lymph node levels I to III.
  • Key Transition Acknowledgments:
    1. Fewer patients were presenting with advanced local disease (with or without grave signs by Haagensen).
    2. Extirpation of the pectoralis major muscle was not essential for local-regional control in stages I and II breast cancer.
    3. Modified radical mastectomy and Halsted radical mastectomy did not consistently achieve local-regional control of stage III breast cancer.
  • Incorporation of Radiation Therapy:
    • Integrated into the management of advanced breast cancer.
    • Demonstrated improvements in local-regional control.

NSABP B-04 Trial (Early 1970s)

  • Purpose: To determine the impact of local and regional treatments on survival in operable breast cancer.
  • Enrollment: 1665 women, stratified by clinical assessment of axillary lymph nodes.
  • Randomization:
    • Clinically node-negative women:
      1. Halsted radical mastectomy.
      2. Total mastectomy plus radiation therapy.
      3. Total mastectomy alone.
    • Clinically node-positive women:
      • Halsted radical mastectomy.
      • Total mastectomy plus radiation therapy.
  • Key Findings:
    • No differences in survival between the three groups of node-negative women.
    • No differences in survival between the two groups of node-positive women.
    • Overall survival equivalence persisted at 25 years of follow-up.

NSABP B-06 Trial

  • Type: Phase 3 study.
  • Randomization:
    • 1851 patients were randomized to one of three groups:
      1. Total mastectomy.
      2. Lumpectomy alone.
      3. Lumpectomy with breast irradiation.
  • Key Findings:
    • No difference in disease-free, distant disease-free, and overall survival among the three groups.
    • Omission of radiation therapy led to significantly higher rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in those who received lumpectomy alone.
  • Trial Exclusions:
    • Patients with palpable axillary lymph nodes were excluded.
  • Frozen Section Protocol:
    • Patients randomized to breast-conserving surgery had frozen sections performed.
    • If margins were involved on frozen section, the surgeon proceeded to perform a mastectomy.
    • However, the patient was included in the analysis as having had a breast-conserving operation.
  • Local Recurrences:
    • In B-06, local in-breast recurrences were regarded as "nonevents" in terms of disease-free survival.
  • Impact on Halstedian Concept:
    • Both NSABP B-04 and B-06 trials refuted the Halstedian concept that cancer spread throughout a region of the breast to lymphatics and then on to distant sites.

Bernard Fisher's "Alternative Hypothesis"

  • Breast Cancer as a Systemic Disease:
    • Proposed by: Bernard Fisher.
    • Core Idea: Breast cancer is a systemic disease at diagnosis.
    • Mechanism:
      • Tumor cells have access to both the blood and lymphatic systems.
      • Regional lymph nodes are markers of systemic disease, not barriers to cancer cell dissemination.
  • Host Factors and Metastasis:
    • Host factors are crucial in the development of metastasis.
    • Variations in local-regional treatment are unlikely to significantly impact survival.
  • Challenge to the Hypothesis:
    • Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) Overview Analysis:
      • Reported that avoiding recurrence in a conserved breast can avoid one breast cancer death over the next 15 years for every four recurrences avoided.
      • Implication: Not all breast cancer is systemic at presentation, suggesting that local-regional control does matter for survival in certain cases.

EBCTCG Overview Findings

  • Chemotherapy Regimens:
    • Anthracycline-containing regimens are superior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF).
    • Addition of a taxane to an anthracycline-based regimen reduces breast cancer mortality by one-third.
  • Tamoxifen Therapy:
    • Effective only in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer.
    • May decrease mortality from breast cancer by up to 30%.
  • Impact of Clinical and Pathologic Factors:
    • Proportional reduction in risk was not significantly affected by standard clinical and pathologic factors such as:
      • Tumor size,
      • ER status,
      • Nodal status.
  • Implications for Adjuvant Therapy:
    • Stratification of risk is crucial in determining adjuvant therapy decisions.
    • Goal: Minimize toxicities of therapies in those unlikely to benefit while realizing substantial benefits in local-regional control and survival in those at higher risk.

Evolution of Breast Cancer Classification and Treatment

  • Early Randomized Clinical Trials:
    • Treated all patients similarly, viewing breast cancer as a homogeneous disease.
  • Traditional Pathologic Determinants:
    • Defined by: Conventional light microscopy and basic histologic techniques.
  • Advances in the 1980s:
    • Immunohistochemistry:
      • Allowed assessment of the expression of individual tumor markers (most commonly proteins).
    • DNA Assessment:
      • Initially assessed in terms of ploidy status.
  • DNA and Gene Expression Analysis:
    • Breast cancer specimens interrogated at the DNA level by:
      • Labeling genes of interest and using fluorescent dyes to quantify gene abundance.
      • Comparing a large number of genes simultaneously in a single breast cancer specimen.
  • Gene Expression Arrays:
    • Showed that breast cancers cluster according to their intrinsic gene expression patterns.
    • Identified at least five intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer.
    • These intrinsic subtypes correlate with breast cancer outcomes.
  • Current Classification:
    • Breast cancers are now classified by molecular subtypes.
    • Molecular subtypes are used for risk stratification and decision-making in terms of local-regional and systemic therapies.

Breast Disease and Cancer Consultation Statistics

  • Consultation with a Surgeon:
    • 50% of American women will consult a surgeon regarding breast disease.
  • Breast Biopsy:
    • 25% of women will undergo a breast biopsy for the diagnosis of an abnormality.
  • Breast Cancer Development:
    • 12% of women will develop some variant of breast cancer.

Integration of Treatment Modalities

  • Progress Made:
    • Integration of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy has advanced to:
      • Control local-regional disease.
      • Enhance survival.
      • Improve the quality of life for breast cancer survivors.

Role of Surgeons in Breast Care

  • Primary Physicians:
    • Surgeons are traditionally the first physician consulted for breast care.
  • Importance of Comprehensive Training:
    • Surgeons must be well trained in all aspects of breast care, including:
      • Embryologic development.
      • Growth and development.
      • Benign and malignant disease processes.
    • Goal: Achieve optimal outcomes for patients and their families.

Breast Development and Anatomy

Embryological Development

  • Primary Tissue Bud:
    • Develops from an ingrowth of ectoderm in the mesenchyme.
    • Leads to the formation of 15 to 20 secondary buds.
  • Epithelial Cords:
    • Develop from secondary buds, extending into surrounding mesenchyme.
    • Major (lactiferous) ducts form and open into a shallow mammary pit.
  • Nipple Formation:
    • Mesenchyme proliferation transforms the mammary pit into a nipple during infancy.
    • Inverted nipple results from the failure of the pit to elevate above skin level (occurs in 4% of infants).

Infant and Puberty Stages

  • At Birth:
    • Breasts in males and females are identical, only demonstrating major ducts.
    • Breast enlargement and witch's milk (secretion) may occur due to maternal hormones crossing the placenta.
  • Puberty:
    • Ovarian estrogen and progesterone stimulate breast enlargement, initiating proliferation of epithelial and connective tissue elements.
    • Breasts remain incompletely developed until pregnancy.

Congenital and Rare Anomalies

  • Amastia: Rare, results from arrest in mammary ridge development during the sixth fetal week.
  • Poland's Syndrome:
    • Includes hypoplasia or absence of the breast, costal cartilage and rib defects, hypoplasia of chest wall tissues, and brachysyndactyly.
  • Breast Hypoplasia: Can be iatrogenically induced before puberty by trauma, infection, or radiation therapy.
  • Symmastia: Rare anomaly with webbing between the breasts across the midline.
  • Accessory Nipples (Polythelia):
    • Occurs in <1% of infants.
    • May be associated with urinary and cardiovascular system abnormalities.
  • Supernumerary Breasts:
    • Can occur along the mammary milk line.
    • Most frequently found between the normal nipple location and the symphysis pubis.
  • Associated Syndromes:
    • Turner's Syndrome: Ovarian agenesis and dysgenesis, may include polymastia.
    • Fleischer's Syndrome: Displacement of nipples and bilateral renal hypoplasia, may include polymastia.
  • Accessory Axillary Breast Tissue: Uncommon and usually bilateral.

Anatomical Features

  • Posterior Surface:
    • The breast rests on the fascia of the pectoralis major, serratus anterior, external oblique abdominal muscles, and the upper extent of the rectus sheath.
    • Retromammary bursa: Identified between the investing fascia of the breast and the fascia of the pectoralis major muscles.
  • Axillary Tail of Spence:
    • Extends laterally across the anterior axillary fold.
  • Quadrants:
    • The upper outer quadrant contains a greater volume of tissue than other quadrants.
  • Breast Form and Variations:
    • Conical form with a circular base measuring 10 to 12 cm in diameter.
    • Nulliparous breast: Hemispheric configuration with distinct flattening above the nipple.
  • Changes with Pregnancy and Aging:
    • Pregnancy and Lactation: Breast enlarges, increasing in volume and density.
    • Senescence: Breast becomes flattened, flaccid, and more pendulous with decreased volume.

image.png

image.png

image.png

Axillary Lymph Node Groups

  • Six Recognized Groups:
    1. Axillary Vein Group (Lateral):
      • Location: Medial or posterior to the axillary vein.
      • Number: 4 to 6 lymph nodes.
      • Function: Receives most lymph drainage from the upper extremity.
    2. External Mammary Group (Anterior/Pectoral):
      • Location: Along the lower border of the pectoralis minor muscle, contiguous with the lateral thoracic vessels.
      • Number: 5 to 6 lymph nodes.
      • Function: Receives most lymph drainage from the lateral aspect of the breast.
    3. Scapular Group (Posterior/Subscapular):
      • Location: Along the posterior wall of the axilla at the lateral border of the scapula, contiguous with the subscapular vessels.
      • Number: 5 to 7 lymph nodes.
      • Function: Receives lymph drainage from the lower posterior neck, posterior trunk, and posterior shoulder.
    4. Central Group:
      • Location: Embedded in the fat of the axilla, immediately posterior to the pectoralis minor muscle.
      • Number: 3 to 4 sets of lymph nodes.
      • Function: Receives lymph drainage from the axillary vein, external mammary, and scapular groups, as well as directly from the breast.
    5. Subclavicular Group (Apical):
      • Location: Posterior and superior to the upper border of the pectoralis minor muscle.
      • Number: 6 to 12 sets of lymph nodes.
      • Function: Receives lymph drainage from all other groups of axillary lymph nodes.
    6. Interpectoral Group (Rotter's Lymph Nodes):
      • Location: Interposed between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscles.
      • Number: 1 to 4 lymph nodes.
      • Function: Receives lymph drainage directly from the breast.
      • Pathway: Lymph fluid passes from this group directly into the central and subclavicular groups.

Lymphatic Drainage of the Breast

  • Lymphatic Plexus:
    • Arises in: Interlobular connective tissue and walls of the lactiferous ducts.
    • Communication: With the subareolar plexus of lymph vessels.
  • Efferent Lymph Vessels:
    • Pathway:
      • Pass around the lateral edge of the pectoralis major muscle.
      • Pierce the clavipectoral fascia.
      • End in the external mammary (anterior, pectoral) group of lymph nodes.
      • Some lymph vessels may travel directly to the subscapular (posterior, scapular) group of lymph nodes.
      • From the upper part of the breast, a few lymph vessels pass directly to the subclavicular (apical) group of lymph nodes.
  • Lymph Drainage Distribution:
    • Axillary lymph nodes receive >75% of lymph drainage from the breast.
    • The remaining lymph drainage is primarily from the medial aspect of the breast.
    • This drainage flows through lymph vessels accompanying the perforating branches of the internal mammary artery and enters the parasternal (internal mammary) group of lymph nodes.

Gynecomastia

Gynecomastia and Breast Cancer Risk

  • Cancer Predisposition:
    • Gynecomastia generally does not predispose the male breast to cancer.
    • Klinefelter's Syndrome (XXY):
      • Hypoandrogenic state where gynecomastia is usually evident.
      • Associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.

Gynecomastia Grading

  • Grade I:
    • Mild breast enlargement without skin redundancy.
  • Grade IIa:
    • Moderate breast enlargement without skin redundancy.
  • Grade IIb:
    • Moderate breast enlargement with skin redundancy.
  • Grade III:
    • Marked breast enlargement with skin redundancy and ptosis.

Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Gynecomastia [Schwartz Table]

I. Estrogen Excess States

  • A. Gonadal Origin
    1. True Hermaphroditism
    2. Gonadal Stromal (Nongerminal) Neoplasms of the Testis
      • Leydig Cell (Interstitial)
      • Sertoli Cell
      • Granulosa-Theca Cell
    3. Germ Cell Tumors
      • Choriocarcinoma
      • Seminoma, Teratoma
      • Embryonal Carcinoma
  • B. Nontesticular Tumors
    1. Adrenal Cortical Neoplasms
    2. Lung Carcinoma
    3. Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • C. Endocrine Disorders
  • D. Diseases of the Liver (Nonalcoholic and Alcoholic Cirrhosis)
  • E. Nutrition Alteration States

II. Androgen Deficiency States

  • A. Senescence
  • B. Hypoandrogenic States (Hypogonadism)
    1. Primary Testicular Failure
      • Klinefelter’s Syndrome (XXY)
      • Reifenstein’s Syndrome
      • Rosewater-Gwinup-Hamwi Familial Gynecomastia
      • Kallmann Syndrome
      • Kennedy’s Disease with Associated Gynecomastia
      • Eunuchoidal State (Congenital Anorchia)
      • Hereditary Defects of Androgen Biosynthesis
      • Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Deficiency
    2. Secondary Testicular Failure
      • Trauma
      • Orchitis
      • Cryptorchidism
      • Irradiation
  • C. Renal Failure

III. Pharmacologic Causes

IV. Systemic Diseases with Idiopathic Mechanisms


ANDI Classification of Benign Breast Disorders

image.png

Classification of Benign Breast Disorders

Category Conditions
Nonproliferative Disorders of the Breast - Cysts and apocrine metaplasia
- Duct ectasia
- Mild ductal epithelial hyperplasia
- Calcifications
- Fibroadenoma and related lesions
Proliferative Breast Disorders Without Atypia - Sclerosing adenosis
- Radial and complex sclerosing lesions ??? risk
- Ductal epithelial hyperplasia
- Intraductal papillomas
Atypical Proliferative Lesions - Atypical lobular hyperplasia
- Atypical ductal hyperplasia

Cancer Risk Associated with Benign Breast Disorders and In Situ Carcinoma of the Breast

Abnormality Relative Risk
Nonproliferative lesions of the breast No increased risk
Sclerosing adenosis No increased risk
Intraductal papilloma No increased risk
Florid hyperplasia 1.5 to 2-fold
Atypical lobular hyperplasia 4-fold
Atypical ductal hyperplasia 4-fold
Ductal involvement by cells of atypical ductal hyperplasia 7-fold
Lobular carcinoma in situ 10-fold
Ductal carcinoma in situ 10-fold

Benign Breast Conditions by Reproductive Years

Early Reproductive Years (Age 15–25 years)

  • Fibroadenomas:
    • Common in younger women aged 15 to 25 years.
    • Typically grow to 1 or 2 cm in diameter and then stabilize.
    • Classification:
      • Small fibroadenomas (≤1 cm): Normal.
      • Larger fibroadenomas (≤3 cm): Disorders.
      • Giant fibroadenomas (>3 cm): Disease.
      • Multiple fibroadenomas (more than five lesions in one breast): Disease (very uncommon).
  • Mammographic Screening:
    • Sometimes identifies asymptomatic fibroadenomas in older screened populations.
  • Adolescent Breast Hypertrophy:
    • Etiology is unknown.
    • Spectrum ranges from limited to massive stromal hyperplasia (gigantomastia).
  • Nipple Inversion:
    • Disorder of development of the major ducts, preventing normal protrusion of the nipple.
    • Can lead to mammary duct fistulas:
      • Cause: Nipple inversion predisposes to major duct obstruction.
      • Result: Leads to recurrent subareolar abscess and mammary duct fistula.

Later Reproductive Years (Age 25–40 years)

  • Cyclical Mastalgia and Nodularity:
    • Associated with premenstrual enlargement of the breast.
    • Normal: Physiologic discomfort and lumpiness with the menstrual cycle.
    • Disorder: Painful nodularity that persists for >1 week of the menstrual cycle is considered a disorder.
  • Epithelial Hyperplasia of Pregnancy:
    • Papillary projections may cause bilateral bloody nipple discharge.

Involution of the Breast

  • Lobular Epithelium Involution:
    • Dependent on the specialized stroma around it.
    • Disorders: Integrated involution of stroma and epithelium is not always seen, leading to common disorders.
  • Microcysts and Macrocysts:
    • Rapid stroma involution can leave alveoli, forming microcysts (precursors of macrocysts).
    • Macrocysts:
      • Common and often subclinical.
      • Typically do not require specific treatment.
  • Sclerosing Adenosis:
    • Considered a disorder of both proliferative and involutional phases of the breast cycle.
  • Duct Ectasia and Periductal Mastitis:
    • Duct Ectasia: Involves dilated ducts.
    • Periductal Mastitis:
      • Leads to periductal fibrosis.
      • May result in nipple retraction.
  • Epithelial Hyperplasia:
    • About 60% of women ≥70 years exhibit some degree of epithelial hyperplasia.
    • Atypical Proliferative Diseases:
      • Include ductal and lobular hyperplasia.
      • Display some features of carcinoma in situ.
      • Women with atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia have a fourfold increase in breast cancer risk.

Radial Scars and Complex Sclerosing Lesions

  • Characterization:
    • Central sclerosis with varying degrees of epithelial proliferation, apocrine metaplasia, and papilloma formation.
  • Classification:
    • Radial Scars: Lesions up to 1 cm in diameter.
    • Complex Sclerosing Lesions: Larger lesions beyond 1 cm.
  • Origin:
    • Arise at sites of terminal duct branching.
    • Characteristic histologic changes radiate from a central area of fibrosis.
  • Histologic Features:
    • Larger complex sclerosing lesions exhibit greater disturbance of structure with:
      • Papilloma formation
      • Apocrine metaplasia
      • Occasionally sclerosing adenosis.
  • Diagnostic Challenges:
    • Distinguishing between a radial scar and invasive breast carcinoma can be difficult, especially based on core-needle biopsy.
    • Imaging features of a radial scar can be similar to those of invasive cancer, often necessitating:
      • Vacuum-assisted biopsy or
      • Surgical excision to exclude the possibility of carcinoma.

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH) & DCIS

  • Histological Appearance:
    • Similar to low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
    • Composed of monotonous round, cuboidal, or polygonal cells enclosed by basement membrane with rare mitoses.
  • Size-Based Classification:
    • ADH: Lesions up to 2 or 3 mm in size.
    • DCIS: Lesions larger than 3 mm.
  • Diagnostic Considerations:
    • Core-needle biopsy may not be sufficient for diagnosis; excisional biopsy is often required for proper classification.
  • Risk and Counseling:
    • Individuals diagnosed with ADH are at increased risk for breast cancer.
    • They should be counseled on risk reduction strategies appropriately.

Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia (ALH) and Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS)

Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia (ALH)

  • Characteristics:
    • Results in minimal distention of lobular units.
    • Cells are similar to those seen in LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ).

Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS)

  • Diagnosis:
    • Identified when small monomorphic cells distend the terminal ductal lobular unit.
    • Acini are full and distended while maintaining the overall lobular architecture.
  • Classic LCIS:
    • Not associated with specific mammographic or palpable abnormalities.
    • Often an incidental finding noted on breast biopsy.
    • Management:
      • Not treated with excision.
      • Patients are at risk for developing invasive breast cancer in either breast.
      • Counseling on appropriate risk reduction strategies is essential.
  • Pleomorphic LCIS:
    • Variant of LCIS.
    • May present with calcifications or other suspicious mammographic changes, prompting the need for a biopsy.
    • Diagnostic Challenges:
      • Can be difficult to distinguish from high-grade DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ).
      • Some suggest managing pleomorphic LCIS similarly to DCIS, with attention to margins and consideration of radiation therapy in breast-conserving treatment.

Diagnostic Tools

  • E-cadherin Staining:
    • Immunohistochemical staining for E-cadherin can help differentiate between LCIS and DCIS.
    • Lobular neoplasias (ALH and LCIS): Lack of E-cadherin expression.
    • Ductal lesions: Majority will show E-cadherin reactivity.

Treatment of Recurrent Subareolar Sepsis

Condition Suitable for Fistulectomy Suitable for Total Duct Excision
Abscess Size and Location Small abscess localized to one segment Large abscess affecting >50% of the areolar circumference
Recurrence Pattern Recurrence involving the same segment Recurrence involving a different segment
Nipple Inversion Mild or no nipple inversion Marked nipple inversion
Patient Preference Patient unconcerned about nipple inversion Patient requests correction of nipple inversion
Patient Age Younger patient Older patient
Discharge from Other Ducts No discharge from other ducts Purulent discharge from other ducts
Previous Procedures No prior fistulectomy Recurrence after fistulectomy

Gail Model Overview

  • Purpose: The Gail model is used to calculate the cumulative risk of breast cancer by incorporating multiple risk factors, including:
    • Age
    • Age at menarche
    • Age at first live birth
    • Number of breast biopsy specimens
    • History of atypical hyperplasia
    • Number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer
  • Output: The model provides a 5-year risk and lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.
  • Access: A software program incorporating the Gail model is available from the National Cancer Institute.
  • Recent Modification: The model has been modified to more accurately assess risk in African American women.

Relative Risk Estimates for the Gail Model

Variable Relative Risk
Age at Menarche (years)
- ≥14 1.00
- 12–13 1.10
- ≤11 1.21
Number of Biopsy Specimens/History of Benign Breast Disease, Age <50 years
- 0 1.00
- 1 1.70
- ≥2 2.88
Number of Biopsy Specimens/History of Benign Breast Disease, Age ≥50 years
- 0 1.02
- 1 1.27
- ≥2 1.62
Age at First Live Birth (years)
<20 years
- 0 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 1.00
- 1 first-degree relative with history of breast cancer 2.61
- ≥2 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 6.80
20–24 years
- 0 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 1.24
- 1 first-degree relative with history of breast cancer 2.68
- ≥2 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 5.78
25–29 years
- 0 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 1.55
- 1 first-degree relative with history of breast cancer 2.76
- ≥2 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 4.91
≥30 years
- 0 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 1.93
- 1 first-degree relative with history of breast cancer 2.83
- ≥2 first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer 4.17

Claus Model for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

  • Development:
    • Based on data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study (a case-control study of breast cancer).
    • Developed by Claus et al.
  • Key Features:
    • Focus on Family History:
      • Incorporates more detailed information about family history compared to the Gail model.
      • Provides individual estimates of breast cancer risk based on the presence of first- and second-degree relatives with breast cancer and their age at diagnosis.
    • Excludes Other Risk Factors:
      • Unlike the Gail model, it excludes other risk factors such as age at menarche, age at first live birth, etc.
  • Comparison with Gail Model:
    • Claus Model:
      • Includes: More detailed family history.
      • Excludes: Other risk factors.
    • Gail Model:
      • Includes: Age, age at menarche, age at first live birth, number of breast biopsy specimens, history of atypical hyperplasia, number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer.
  • Risk Assessment:
    • Provides estimates of breast cancer risk according to decade of life.
    • Focuses on high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes.
  • Exclusion of Certain Risk Factors:
    • Diet, use of oral contraceptives, lactation: Less consistently associated with breast cancer, therefore excluded.
    • Radiation exposure: Rare in the general population, thus excluded from both the Gail and Claus models.
  • Other Models:
    • Some models include mammographic breast density in assessing breast cancer risk.

BRCAPRO Model for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment

  • Limitations of the Gail and Claus Models:
    • Gail Model and Claus Model do not account for the risk associated with mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.
  • BRCAPRO Model:
    • Type: Mendelian model.
    • Purpose: Calculates the probability that an individual is a carrier of a mutation in one of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 or BRCA2.
    • Inputs: Based on family history of breast and ovarian cancer.
  • Risk Calculation:
    • Probability of Mutation:
      • The model calculates the probability that an individual carries a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
    • Probability of Developing Cancer:
      • Derived from the mutation probability, using age-specific incidence curves for both mutation carriers and noncarriers.
  • Clinical Use:
    • Challenges:
      • Requires comprehensive input of all family history information regarding breast and ovarian cancer.
      • This complexity can make the use of the BRCAPRO model challenging in clinical settings.

Tyrer-Cuzick Model for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

  • Purpose:
    • Combines family history information with individual risk factors to assess breast cancer risk.
  • Key Features:
    • Family History:
      • Calculates the probability that an individual carries a mutation in one of the breast cancer susceptibility genes.
    • Personal Risk Factors:
      • Adjusts the risk based on factors including:
        • Age at menarche
        • Parity
        • Age at first live birth
        • Age at menopause
        • History of atypical hyperplasia or LCIS
        • Height
        • Body mass index (BMI)
  • Application:
    • Risk Communication:
      • Once the model has been utilized, the assessed risk must be communicated to the individual.
      • This risk should be put into context with competing risks and medical comorbidities.
    • Discussion of Options:
      • The information can then be used to discuss available options for managing risk with the individual.

Breast Cancer Risk and Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)

  • Increased Risk with Hormone Replacement Therapy:
    • Threefold to fourfold higher risk of breast cancer after >4 years of use of HRT.
    • No significant reduction in coronary artery or cerebrovascular risks associated with HRT.
  • Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer:
    • Study Overview:
      • Combined and reanalyzed data from 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer.
    • Findings:
      • Increased risk of breast cancer with every use of estrogen replacement therapy.
      • Increased risk was noted among current users but not past users.
      • Risk increased with the duration of use of hormone replacement therapy.
  • WHI Study (Cheblowski et al.):
    • Reported that estrogen + progesterone increased the incidence of breast cancer.
  • Million Women Study:
    • Confirmed the findings of the WHI study.
    • Increased risk was substantially greater for the combined estrogen + progesterone replacement therapy compared to other types of hormone replacement therapy.

Screening Mammography Recommendations for Average-Risk Women

Key Organizations and Guidelines

  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF):
    • Recommendation:
      • Biennial screening mammography for women aged 50 to 74 years.
    • Guidelines Application:
      • Applies to asymptomatic women aged >40 years who:
        • Do not have preexisting breast cancer.
        • Were not previously diagnosed with a high-risk breast lesion.
        • Are not at high risk due to known genetic mutations or history of chest radiation at a young age.
  • American Cancer Society (ACS):
    • Updated Guidelines (October 2015):
      • Annual screening mammography starting at 45 years of age.
      • Women aged 45 to 54 years: Screened annually.
      • Women aged 55 years and older: Transition to biennial screening or continue annual screening based on preference.
      • Women aged 40 to 44 years: Have the opportunity to begin annual screening.
      • Screening should continue as long as overall health is good and life expectancy is 10 years or longer.
    • Clinical Breast Examination:
      • Not recommended for average-risk women at any age.
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN):
    • Recommendation:
      • Annual screening mammography starting at 40 years of age.
      • Includes annual clinical breast exams and breast awareness.

High-Risk Women Definition (According to USPSTF, ACS, NCCN)

  • Personal history of breast cancer.
  • History of chest radiation at a young age.
  • Confirmed or suspected genetic mutation known to increase breast cancer risk.

Controversy of Screening Mammography in Women <50 Years of Age

  • Challenges:
    1. Breast density:
      • Greater in younger women, reducing the sensitivity of mammography.
    2. False-positive test findings:
      • More common, leading to unnecessary biopsies.
    3. Lower incidence of breast cancer:
      • Younger women are less likely to have breast cancer, so fewer benefit from screening.
  • U.S. Perspective:
    • The benefits of screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years generally outweigh the risks.
    • Targeting mammography to higher-risk women can improve the balance of risks and benefits.

American Cancer Society (ACS) and MRI Screening

  • MRI Screening:
    • Recommended for women with a 20% to 25% or greater lifetime risk based on risk assessment tools.
    • Eligible Individuals:
      • BRCA mutation carriers.
      • Individuals with a family member with a BRCA mutation who have not been tested themselves.
      • Individuals who received radiation to the chest between the ages of 10 and 30 years.
      • Individuals with a history of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Cowden syndrome, or Bannayan-Riley Ruvalcaba syndrome.
      • Those with a first-degree relative with one of the above syndromes.
  • Advantages of MRI:
    • Extremely sensitive screening tool.
    • Not limited by breast density as mammography is.
  • Disadvantages of MRI:
    • Moderate specificity, leading to more false-positive events.
    • Increased need for biopsy due to false positives.

Tamoxifen Therapy Recommendations and Risks

Indications for Tamoxifen Therapy:

  • Recommended for women who meet any of the following criteria:
    • Gail relative risk of 1.66% or higher.
    • Age 35 to 59 years.
    • Women over the age of 60.
    • Diagnosis of:
      • Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS).
      • Atypical ductal hyperplasia.
      • Atypical lobular hyperplasia.

Associated Risks of Tamoxifen:

  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT):
    • Occurs 1.6 times as often in women taking tamoxifen.
  • Pulmonary Emboli:
    • Occurs 3.0 times as often in women taking tamoxifen.
  • Endometrial Cancer:
    • Occurs 2.5 times as often in women taking tamoxifen.
    • Increased risk is primarily for early-stage cancers in postmenopausal women.
  • Cataracts:
    • Cataract surgery is required almost twice as often among women taking tamoxifen.

Gail Model for Tamoxifen Use:

  • Gail et al. developed a model to account for:
    • The underlying risk of breast cancer.
    • Comorbidities to determine the net risk-benefit ratio of tamoxifen use for chemoprevention.

image.png

image.png

image.png

Classification of Invasive Breast Cancers

General Classification

  • Special-Type Cancer:
    • To qualify as a special-type cancer, at least 90% of the cancer must contain the defining histologic features.
  • Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of No Special Type (NST):
    • About 80% of invasive breast cancers are classified as invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type (NST).
    • Generally, these cancers have a worse prognosis compared to special-type cancers.

Foote and Stewart Classification:

  1. Paget's Disease of the Nipple
  2. Invasive Ductal Carcinoma:
    • Adenocarcinoma with productive fibrosis (scirrhous, simplex, NST).
    • 80% of invasive breast cancers.
  3. Medullary Carcinoma:
    • 4% of invasive breast cancers.
  4. Mucinous (Colloid) Carcinoma:
    • 2% of invasive breast cancers.
  5. Papillary Carcinoma:
    • 2% of invasive breast cancers.
  6. Tubular Carcinoma:
    • 2% of invasive breast cancers.
  7. Invasive Lobular Carcinoma:
    • 10% of invasive breast cancers.
  8. Rare Cancers:
    • Includes adenoid cystic, squamous cell, and apocrine carcinomas.

Medullary Carcinoma Characteristics

Microscopic Features:

  1. Lymphoreticular Infiltrate:
    • Dense infiltrate composed predominantly of lymphocytes and plasma cells.
  2. Nuclei Characteristics:
    • Large pleomorphic nuclei that are poorly differentiated.
    • Show active mitosis.
  3. Growth Pattern:
    • Sheet-like growth pattern with minimal or absent ductal or alveolar differentiation.

Associated Features:

  • Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS):
    • Approximately 50% of medullary carcinomas are associated with DCIS.
    • DCIS is characteristically present at the periphery of the cancer.
  • Hormone Receptor Status:
    • <10% of medullary carcinomas demonstrate hormone receptors.

Mucinous Carcinoma (Colloid Carcinoma)

General Characteristics:

  • Prevalence:
    • Accounts for 2% of all invasive breast cancers.
  • Typical Presentation:
    • Often presents as a bulky tumor in the older population.

Defining Features:

  • Extracellular Pools of Mucin:
    • Surround aggregates of low-grade cancer cells.
  • Cut Surface:
    • Glistening and gelatinous in quality.
  • Fibrosis:
    • Variable; when abundant, it imparts a firm consistency to the cancer.

Hormone Receptor Status:

  • >90% of mucinous carcinomas display hormone receptors.

Lymph Node Metastases:

  • Occur in 33% of cases.

Survival Rates:

  • 5-year survival rate: 73%.
  • 10-year survival rate: 59%.

Diagnostic Considerations:

  • Mucinous Component:
    • Cancer cells may not be evident in all microscopic sections.
    • Analysis of multiple sections is essential to confirm the diagnosis.

Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast

Prevalence: Accounts for 2% of all invasive breast cancers.

Typical Presentation: Generally presents in the seventh decade of life and occurs disproportionately in nonwhite women.

Tumor Size and Structure:

  • Typically small, rarely exceeding 3 cm in diameter.
  • Characterized by papillae with fibrovascular stalks and multilayered epithelium.

Hormone Receptor Status: 87% of papillary carcinomas express estrogen receptor (based on SEER database findings).

Prognosis:

  • Show a low frequency of axillary lymph node metastases.
  • 5-year and 10-year survival rates are similar to those for mucinous and tubular carcinoma.

Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast

Prevalence: Accounts for 2% of all invasive breast cancers.

Diagnosis:

  • Reported in up to 20% of women whose cancers are diagnosed by mammographic screening.
  • Usually diagnosed in the perimenopausal or early menopausal periods.

Histologic Features:

  • Under low-power magnification, a haphazard array of small, randomly arranged tubular elements is observed.

Hormone Receptor Status: 94% of tubular carcinomas express estrogen receptor (based on SEER database findings).

Prognosis:

  • 10% of women with tubular carcinoma or invasive cribriform carcinoma (a related special-type cancer) will develop axillary lymph node metastases.
  • The presence of metastatic disease in one or two axillary lymph nodes does not adversely affect survival.
  • Distant metastases are rare.
  • Long-term survival approaches 100%.

PALB2 and Breast Cancer Risk

Role of PALB2: PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2) is a potential high-risk gene for breast cancer. It allows nuclear localization of BRCA2 and provides a scaffold for the BRCA1–PALB2–BRCA2 complex.

Breast Cancer Risk:

  • Analysis by Antoniou et al suggests that the risk of breast cancer for PALB2 mutation carriers is as high as that of BRCA2 mutation carriers.
  • Absolute Risk by Age 70:
    • 33% (95% CI, 25–44) for those with no family history of breast cancer.
    • 58% (95% CI, 50–66) for those with two or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer by age 50.
  • The risk for female PALB2 mutation carriers is about five to nine times higher compared to the general population, depending on age.

Screening and Management:

  • Screening: Suggested to begin with mammogram along with MRI starting at age 30.
  • Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Consideration is given for those with PALB2 mutations.
  • Ovarian Cancer Risk: There is insufficient evidence regarding the risk and management of ovarian cancer for PALB2 mutation carriers.

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

TRIALS in Breast Cancer:

  1. Oncotype DX:
    • Objective: To develop a genomic test that predicts the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence and the benefit of chemotherapy in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
    • Details: The test analyzes the expression of 21 genes within a tumor to generate a Recurrence Score (RS) that stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high risk of recurrence. This score helps to guide decisions on whether to add chemotherapy to endocrine therapy.

      Oncotype DX Recurrence Score:

      Score Ranges:

      • Low Risk (RS 0-10): Low recurrence risk; endocrine therapy alone is sufficient.
      • Intermediate Risk (RS 11-25): Most can avoid chemotherapy; endocrine therapy recommended (clarified by TAILORx trial).
      • High Risk (RS 26-100): High recurrence risk; chemotherapy recommended in addition to endocrine therapy.

      Interpretation of the Oncotype DX Score:

      • The Recurrence Score helps personalize treatment, allowing for a more tailored approach. Patients with low scores are often spared chemotherapy, while those with high scores are recommended for more aggressive treatment to prevent recurrence. The intermediate range has been refined through trials like TAILORx to guide more precise treatment strategies.
      • TAILORx (Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment):
        • Objective: To refine the use of the Oncotype DX test by determining the best course of treatment for women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and an intermediate Recurrence Score.
        • Details: This trial enrolled over 10,000 women and found that women with a Recurrence Score of 11-25 could safely avoid chemotherapy and achieve similar outcomes with endocrine therapy alone. The results significantly influenced treatment guidelines, especially for patients with intermediate scores.
      • MammaPrint:
        • Objective: To provide a prognostic genomic test for assessing the risk of distant metastasis in early-stage breast cancer patients.
        • Details: MammaPrint analyzes the expression of 70 genes to classify patients into high-risk or low-risk categories for recurrence. The test is particularly used to determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to other treatments.
      • MINDACT (Microarray In Node-negative and 1 to 3 positive lymph node Disease may Avoid ChemoTherapy):
        • Objective: To assess the clinical utility of the MammaPrint test in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in breast cancer.
        • Details: This trial enrolled nearly 7,000 patients and showed that patients with low-risk MammaPrint scores could avoid chemotherapy, even if their clinical risk was high. The trial validated MammaPrint as a useful tool in making treatment decisions, potentially sparing patients from unnecessary chemotherapy.
      • NSABP B17 (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17):
        • Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy following lumpectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
        • Details: The study found that adding radiation therapy to lumpectomy significantly reduced the incidence of both ipsilateral invasive breast cancer and ipsilateral DCIS, establishing lumpectomy plus radiation as a standard of care for DCIS.
      • NSABP B24:
        • Objective: To investigate the addition of tamoxifen to lumpectomy and radiation therapy in the treatment of DCIS.
        • Details: The trial demonstrated that tamoxifen further reduced the risk of both invasive and non-invasive breast cancer recurrence compared to lumpectomy and radiation alone, influencing the incorporation of tamoxifen in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive DCIS.
      • SENTINA (Sentinel NeoAdjuvant):
        • Objective: To explore the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
        • Details: The trial highlighted the challenges in identifying sentinel lymph nodes after chemotherapy but also showed that SLNB could be performed with acceptable accuracy, particularly when the nodes were clinically negative before chemotherapy.
      • SN FNAC Trial (Sentinel Node Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology):
        • Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in detecting metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients.
        • Details: The trial demonstrated that FNAC could be a useful tool in identifying metastatic disease in sentinel nodes, aiding in the surgical decision-making process and potentially reducing the need for more invasive procedures.
      • NSABP B32:
        • Objective: To compare the outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients.
        • Details: This large randomized trial found that SLNB is as effective as ALND in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival but is associated with fewer complications, such as lymphedema. The results supported the adoption of SLNB as the standard of care for axillary staging in clinically node-negative breast cancer.
      • ALMANAC Trial (Axillary Lymphatic Mapping Against Nodal Axillary Clearance):
        • Objective: To assess the morbidity associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) compared to standard axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer.
        • Details: The trial demonstrated that SLNB was associated with significantly lower morbidity, including reduced lymphedema, sensory loss, and arm movement restriction, compared to ALND. These findings further solidified the role of SLNB as the preferred method for axillary staging.
      • ACOSOG Z0010 (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0010):
        • Objective: To determine the clinical significance of micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow in breast cancer patients.
        • Details: The study provided evidence that micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow were associated with a slightly worse prognosis, but their presence did not necessarily mandate additional axillary treatment, influencing a more conservative approach to axillary management.
      • ACOSOG Z0011:
        • Objective: To evaluate whether axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) could be omitted in breast cancer patients with limited sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis.
        • Details: This trial revolutionized breast cancer surgery by showing that patients with one or two positive sentinel nodes who undergo breast-conserving surgery and receive radiation do not benefit from additional axillary dissection. This finding significantly reduced the extent of surgery for many patients.
      • RTOG 01/13 & NSABP B39 (ABPI-R):
        • Objective: To compare whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with partial-breast irradiation (PBI) in early-stage breast cancer patients.
        • Details: The trials aimed to determine if PBI, which targets a smaller area of the breast, could provide similar local control with fewer side effects compared to WBI. Results suggested that PBI might be a viable alternative to WBI for selected patients, with a similar risk of recurrence and potential benefits in reducing radiation exposure to surrounding tissues.
      • NSABP B18:
        • Objective: To compare the effects of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy versus postoperative (adjuvant) chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer.
        • Details: The trial demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could shrink tumors before surgery, increasing the likelihood of breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy) rather than mastectomy. It also showed that the timing of chemotherapy did not affect overall survival, but neoadjuvant therapy provided additional benefits in terms of surgical options and assessing tumor response to chemotherapy.
      • SOFT (Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial):
        • Objective: Evaluate the benefit of adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) to tamoxifen or using exemestane with OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.
        • Key Findings: OFS combined with tamoxifen or exemestane significantly reduced recurrence risk, especially in higher-risk women.
      • TEXT (Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial):
        • Objective: Compare tamoxifen plus OFS versus exemestane plus OFS in premenopausal women.
        • Key Findings: Exemestane plus OFS provided better disease-free survival than tamoxifen plus OFS, particularly in high-risk women.
      • HERA (HERceptin Adjuvant) Trial:
        • Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab (Herceptin) as an adjuvant therapy in women with HER2-positive early breast cancer.
        • Details:
      • The trial involved women with HER2-positive early breast cancer who, after completing surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (if applicable), were randomly assigned to receive either trastuzumab for 1 or 2 years, or observation.
      • Key Findings: The trial demonstrated that 1 year of trastuzumab significantly reduced the risk of breast cancer recurrence and improved overall survival compared to observation. These results established trastuzumab as a standard part of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer.
      • NSABP B-31 Trial:
        • Objective: To determine the benefits of adding trastuzumab (Herceptin) to standard chemotherapy (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel) in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.
        • Details:
      • The trial compared the outcomes of women receiving the standard chemotherapy regimen with or without the addition of trastuzumab.
      • Key Findings: The addition of trastuzumab to standard chemotherapy significantly improved disease-free survival and overall survival. The results, along with findings from a similar trial (N9831), led to trastuzumab being integrated into standard care for HER2-positive early breast cancer.
      • CLEOPATRA (CLinical Evaluation Of Pertuzumab And TRAstuzumab) Trial:
        • Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and docetaxel in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
        • Details:
      • The trial involved patients with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, who were randomly assigned to receive either trastuzumab and docetaxel with pertuzumab or a placebo.
      • Key Findings: The addition of pertuzumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to trastuzumab and docetaxel alone. This combination became a new standard of care for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
      • CREATE-X (Capecitabine for Residual Cancer as Adjuvant Therapy) Trial:
        • Objective: To assess the benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
        • Details:
      • The trial enrolled patients who had residual disease after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were randomly assigned to receive standard therapy with or without the addition of capecitabine.
      • Key Findings: The addition of capecitabine significantly improved disease-free survival and overall survival, particularly in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This led to capecitabine being recommended for patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially in high-risk subgroups.